Print function drop last column

[David Bosak]

Our customer is encountering a serious problem when printing a GridDataboundGrid. Sometimes the print function doesn''t print the last column of the grid. I cannot duplicate this defect on our printer but the customer has usually been facing it.
Below is the code to print a document with a title at the top of the paper and the grid under.

public static void PrintGrid(GridDataBoundGrid dtgbGrid, Font titFont,string strtitle)
{
try
{
//DataGridPrintDocument dgrPrintDoc = new DataGridPrintDocument ( titleFont, title);
//dgrPrintDoc.Print();
titleFont=titFont;
title=strtitle;
PrintDataBoundGrid(dtgbGrid);

if(log.LogDebug())
log.Info("Print Grid");
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message, "Information", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Information);
if(log.LogDebug())
log.Error(ex.Message);
}
}

public static void PrintDataBoundGrid(GridDataBoundGrid dtgbGrid/*, Font titleFont,string title*/)
{
//
// Add method to print the Title
//
//PrintGrid(
try
{
GridPrintDocument pd = new GridPrintDocument(dtgbGrid); //Assumes the default printer
pd.DefaultPageSettings.Margins.Top+=50;
pd.DefaultPageSettings.Margins.Left-=25;
pd.DefaultPageSettings.Margins.Right-=25;
pd.PrintPage+=new PrintPageEventHandler(pd_PrintPage);
pd.PrintController=new StandardPrintController();
dtgbGrid.Properties.PrintHorzLines = false;
dtgbGrid.Properties.PrintVertLines = false;
dtgbGrid.Properties.PrintFrame=false;
dtgbGrid.Properties.CenterHorizontal=false;

pd.Print();
if(log.LogDebug())
log.Info("Print Data bound grid");
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message, "Information", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Information);
if(log.LogDebug())
log.Error(ex.Message);
}
}

private static void pd_PrintPage(object sender, PrintPageEventArgs e)
{

if(title!="")
{
Pen p=new Pen(Color.Black);
e.Graphics.DrawString(title,titleFont,p.Brush,e.MarginBounds.Left,e.MarginBounds.Top-50);
e.PageSettings.Margins.Top+=50;
title="";
}

}

[Administrator]

Are you using 3.0.1.0? This has a fix for in it for handles one problem like you are describing.

[David Bosak]

I''m using 2.1.0.9. Is the defect totally fixed in 3.0.1.0? Sorry for not understanding your statement "This has a fix for in it for handles one problem like you are describing". We are getting 3.0.1.0 and try to integrate to our current code. Thanks a lot.

>Are you using 3.0.1.0? This has a fix for in it for handles one problem like you are describing.

[Administrator]

>>Is the defect totally fixed in 3.0.1.0?

I don''t know what the exact defect is that you are seeing. If you can upload a sample project showing the defect (or send it to [e-mail]), then I can test it with 3010 and tell you if it is fixed or not. But without testing the exact defect you are seeing, I cannot explicitly tell you that it is fixed.