Syncfusion controls and Polymer or x-tag

[Edvin]

Hi all.

Have you any experience using javascript controls with or within web components ?

As polymer or x-tag implementation ?

Thanks for advance.

Edvin 

[Harikrishnan P]

Hi Edvin,

Thanks for your interest in Syncfusion products.

We need to validate the above query. So we will update you regarding this query in two business days (on 11^th July)

Please let us know if you have further queries

Regards

HariKrishnan.

[Saranya Sivakumar]

Hi Edvin,

Our Essential Studio JavaScript are client-side controls, we have not implemented our Essential JS Studio Components based on any specific Framework. So obviously our JavaScript controls will works with Polymer library also. Here we have attached the Datepicker sample which is rendered using Polymer library.

Please refer the following sample for your reference.

Sample Location: Polymer Sample

Please let us know if you have further concern.

Regards,

Saranya.S

[Saranya Sivakumar]

Hi Edvin,

Our Essential Studio JavaScript are client-side controls, we have not implemented our Essential JS Studio Components based on any specific Framework. So obviously our JavaScript controls will works with Polymer library also. Here we have attached the Datepicker sample which is rendered using Polymer library.

Please refer the following sample for your reference.

Sample Location: Polymer Sample

Please let us know if you have further concern.

Regards,

Saranya.S

[Edvin]

Hi, Saranya.

Yes your controls are pure js jQuery based and they should work as in your example.

But like your support for angular.js, do you have any plans to create web components (http://webcomponents.org) for your controls ?

If you take a look at Google I/O 2013 and 2014 there is a lot about Polymer componets and Google plans using web components.

I believe web developers need option  to build applications in a declarative, composable way.

I thing supporting web components in future (polymer or x-tag) will be "must have" feature.

And finally. Supporting angular in future means: supporting version 2.x - new web component frendly framework.

What's yor opinion ?

Thanks for advance.

Edvin

 

[Saranya Sivakumar]

Hi Edvin,
Thanks for your update.
We need to analyze more about your suggestion(supporting version 2.x new web component framework). So, we will update you with further details regarding this in 2 business days(7/18/2014).
Please let us know if you have further queries.
Regards,

Saranya.S

[Saranya Sivakumar]

Hi Edvin,

We consider your suggestion for supporting new web component framework. We will log this as a feature request. As per the dependency of our control we will implement this feature in any of our upcoming releases. We usually have an interval of at least three months between releases. The feature implementation would also greatly depend on the factors such as product design, code compatibility and complexity. We will update you when this feature has been implemented.

Please let us know if you have further queries.

Thanks,

Saranya.S

 

[Rodrigo Silva]

Any news? Web components are web's natural evolution...

[Harikrishnan P]

Hi Rodrigo,

We would like to inform you that, currently the feature (“Complete web components support for Essential JS components, as available in Polymer/X-tag”) is not yet implemented.

It will be implemented in any of our future releases. We will update this thread once this feature is implemented.

Please let us know if you have further queries.

Regards,

HariKrishnan

[Stadelmann Didier]

Hello,

Any news about Polymer ? Thanks

[Shanmugaraja K]

Hi Stadelmann, 

 

Thanks for your update, 

 

We have not provided full support for Syncfusion controls with Polymer. Since, Syncfusion controls based on JavaScript so obviously, it will work with polymer library also. Here we have attached the Date picker sample which is rendered using Polymer library. 

 

Sample: http://www.syncfusion.com/downloads/support/forum/116948/ze/Polymer_Sample625390760  

 

Please check the sample and let us know if you need further assistance. 

 

Regards, 

Shanmugaraja K