parse xhtml

[Steltenpool]

the appended html is xhtml-strict according to the W3C check site. Yet if i parse it through the paragraph. AppendHTML. it gives the following error and stops executing:

DocIO support only welformatted xhtml \nDetails:\nUnexpected DTD declaration. Line 1, position 46

if i then remove the doctype part it complains about the table structure, however non of this comes out of the w3c test; What can i do?

Please help.


"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">

The table below summarizes your responses to questions that have been categorized as "Quality Questions", that is testing elements that go towards assessing the overall quality of the engagement.

Number	Question Title	Answer given	Score
13.1.1.	Team Composition	Yes	0
14.2.19.	Team Members' Accreditation	No	100
14.2.21.	Work in Foreign Jurisdictions	N/A - team members did not work in foreign jurisdictions	0
14.4.1.	Determining the Scope of the Opportunity	Yes	0
14.5.2.	Engagement Plan	Yes	0
15.1.2.	Use of Approved Methodologies	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	20
15.1.3.	Information Gathering and Analysis	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	10
15.1.4.	Communication of Progress to Client	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	10
15.1.5.	Technical - Technical and Professional elements	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	10
15.1.6.	Project Management - Use of Appropriate Techniques	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	10
15.1.1.	Use of the Work of an External Third Party/Expert	N/A	0
15.2.8.	Revision of Engagement Plan	Yes	0
15.4.1.	Project Management - Managing the Engagement	Yes	0
15.4.2.	Project Management - Managing Financial Performance	Yes	0
15.4.3.	Project Management - Overall Financial Performance	Yes	0
15.4.4.	Project Management - Client billing	Yes	0
15.4.5.	Project Management - Collection Efforts	N/A	0
15.4.6.	Project Management - Collection of Final Bill	N/A - engagement is ongoing/final invoice still current	0
15.5.6.	Content of Representation Letter - Best Practice	1 - Satisfactory	0
15.5.15.	Involvement of Engagement Leader	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	10
15.5.16.	Involvement of Engagement Manager	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	5
15.5.17.	Involvement of EQCR	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	10
15.5.18.	Responsiveness to the Client	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	10
15.5.19.	Value Added by Our Services	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	5
16.1.1.	Documentation (Including Supplementary Information)	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	20
16.1.2.	Extent of Supplementary Information Required	2 - Satisfactory with Comments - only minimal additional information or explanations required or provided	10
16.2.2.	Client Satisfaction - Nature of Feedback Obtained	2 - Satisfactory with Comments	5
16.2.3.	Client Satisfaction - Action Taken	Yes	0
Quality Questions Subtotal			235

Except as already addressed in your answers to the questions above, are there other factors relating to engagement quality (either positive or negative) that you consider should be taken into account in assessing the overall engagement performance?

[Rajendran]

Hi Steltenpool,

Thank you for your interest in Syncfusion Products.

Currently we are supporting XHTML 1.0 version. Only objects as defined in XHTML 1.0 version will be supported by us. In future we will enhance it to support latest versions. Regarding your query Please try our code snippet to append html to paragraph.
//A new document is created.
WordDocument document = new WordDocument();
document.XHTMLValidateOption = XHTMLValidationType.None;
//Add a new section to the document.
IWSection section = document.AddSection();
//Adding a new paragraph to the section.
IWParagraph paragraph = section.AddParagraph();
//Insert Text into the paragraph
paragraph.AppendText("Hello World!html");
//pass html as parameter
paragraph.AppendHTML(html);

Sample html:

The table below summarizes your responses to questions that have been categorized as "Quality Questions", that is testing elements that go towards assessing the overall quality of the engagement.

Number	Question Title	Answer given	Score
13.1.1.	Team Composition	Yes	0
14.2.19.	Team Members' Accreditation	No	100

Please try this and let us know if you have any questions.

Regards,
Rajendran

[Steltenpool]

i found the problem commented out code is not taken into account:

; so i built a method which extract these comments and now it works!!!

[Rajendran]

Hi Steltenpool,

We are glad that you have found out the solution by yourself.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Regards,
Rajendran