We use cookies to give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to browse, then you agree to our privacy policy and cookie policy. (Last updated on : Nov 16th 2018).
Unfortunately, activation email could not send to your email. Please try again.
Syncfusion Feedback

Link license for 3.2.1.0

Thread ID:

Created:

Updated:

Platform:

Replies:

30701 Jun 22,2005 11:14 AM UTC Jun 22,2005 11:30 AM UTC General Discussion 1
loading
Tags: General Discussion
Thibaut Barrère
Asked On June 22, 2005 11:14 AM UTC

Hi We''re in the process of migrating our products line from syncfusion 2.0.5.1 to 3.2.1.0. After carefully reading the readme file, I have a question about link licenses (licenses for build server). I have the following questions: 1- I noticed the download package is the same for standard license and link license. Is there really still a difference ? 2- We usually copy all of our third party dependencies (such as syncfusion dll) to a network share whenever possible, and we remove the third party dll from the GAC on the build server if it''s in the GAC (this allow very simple backup / replication of the build server). We reference assemblies using explicit file references such as R:\Libs\Syncfusion\3.2.1.0\Syncfusion.Grid.Base.dll instead of referencing them from the GAC for that purpose. Is this way of doing going to work (especially with the new licensing scheme) ? Where can am I supposed to copy the syncfusion assemblies from ? (there are two places, the PrecompiledAssemblies folder being one of them). 3- We are writing a script to automatically update our projects to syncfusion 3.2.1.0. Is it enough to just convert the syncfusion references (eg: Grid => Grid.Base+Grid.Windows) and to add the licenses.licx file as embedded resource to do the job ? Or is there anything more ? a quick answer to all these items would be very much appreciated :) kind regards Thibaut Barrère http://www.dotnetguru2.org/tbarrere

Thibaut Barrère
Replied On June 22, 2005 11:30 AM UTC

I would add two things: 4- where am I supposed to add a reference to Syncfusion.Core.dll ? Only in the final exe, or in each syncfusion dependent library ? 5- the release notes for v3.2.1.0 ( http://www.syncfusion.com/squiffler/patches/v3.2.1.0/readme.htm ) do not seem to give the same information found on the forum for the content of the licences.licx. http://www.syncfusion.com/Support/Forums/message.aspx?MessageID=28643 tells we should just have the following line: Syncfusion.Core.Licensing.LicensedComponent, Syncfusion.Core where as the readme file states that we should have : Syncfusion.Core.Licensing.LicensedComponent, Syncfusion.Core, Version=3.200.1.0,Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=..... This is a bit confusing, what is the recommended way of doing this ? kind regards Thibaut

CONFIRMATION

This post will be permanently deleted. Are you sure you want to continue?

Sorry, An error occured while processing your request. Please try again later.

Warning Icon You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer that may not display all features of this and other websites. Upgrade to Internet Explorer 8 or newer for a better experience.Close Icon

;