We use cookies to give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to browse, then you agree to our privacy policy and cookie policy. (Last updated on : Nov 16th 2018).
Unfortunately, activation email could not send to your email. Please try again.
Syncfusion Feedback

Any way to use the grid w/o installing to the GAC?

Thread ID:

Created:

Updated:

Platform:

Replies:

13408 Apr 28,2004 12:51 AM UTC Apr 28,2004 12:32 PM UTC WinForms 4
loading
Tags: GridControl
Administrator [Syncfusion]
Asked On April 28, 2004 12:51 AM UTC

I''m currently going over the deployment requirements for my application and wondering if there is a way to avoid having to install the Syncfusion assemblies to each user''s GAC, an operation which requires Admin rights? Putting aside all the benefits of the GAC, is this possible with Syncfusion''s assemblies?

Administrator [Syncfusion]
Replied On April 28, 2004 09:26 AM UTC

When you deploy your app just make sure the syncfusion dlls are in the same folder as the exe. Then you don''t have to put them into the GAC. Stefan

Administrator [Syncfusion]
Replied On April 28, 2004 10:25 AM UTC

That didn''t seem to work, but perhaps the problem was that the licensing wasn''t setup right in that circumstance and it was automatically setup correctly when the GAC scenario was tested? Any special steps required to run the Syncfusion stuff from the app startup directory? >When you deploy your app just make sure the syncfusion dlls are in the same folder as the exe. Then you don''t have to put them into the GAC. > >Stefan >

Administrator [Syncfusion]
Replied On April 28, 2004 11:44 AM UTC

With 1.6 version the fusionlic dll was required to be in the gac. But with 2.0 we got rid of that dll. Instead you only have to make sure a licx is generated for your solution. The Release Notes have some steps how to force generation of licx files. Then the dlls don''t need to be in the gac. Let me know if you continue to have problems. Thanks, Stefan

Administrator [Syncfusion]
Replied On April 28, 2004 12:32 PM UTC

Ah, that must be it, using 1.6. Well thanks, good to keep in mind when we make the move to 2.0 which shouldn''t be too far into the future. >With 1.6 version the fusionlic dll was required to be in the gac. But with 2.0 we got rid of that dll. Instead you only have to make sure a licx is generated for your solution. The Release Notes have some steps how to force generation of licx files. Then the dlls don''t need to be in the gac. > >Let me know if you continue to have problems. > >Thanks, >Stefan >

CONFIRMATION

This post will be permanently deleted. Are you sure you want to continue?

Sorry, An error occured while processing your request. Please try again later.

Warning Icon You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer that may not display all features of this and other websites. Upgrade to Internet Explorer 8 or newer for a better experience.Close Icon

;